Michael Saylor Walks Back Bitcoin Custody Comments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8e20/b8e20de5cad9ff2073a2d7425ffab7ea1dd838a5" alt=""
MicroStrategy founder Michael Saylor faced significant criticism this week after his comments suggesting that Bitcoin should be custodied by large banks rather than individuals. The backlash prompted a quick reversal from Saylor, who clarified his stance on self-custody.
What’s the scoop?
- The Context: Saylor’s original comments encouraged Bitcoin holders to trust "too big to fail" banks for custody, dismissing concerns from "paranoid crypto-anarchists" about centralization and government seizure.
- Called Out: Among others, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin responded sharply, calling Saylor's stance "batshit insane" and arguing that it undermined the decentralized values of crypto.
- Changing Tune: After facing criticism from across the crypto space, Saylor walked back his remarks, stating, "I support self-custody for those willing and able" and that Bitcoin should welcome "all forms of investment" and custody options.
Bankless Take:
Saylor’s quick backtrack underscores the tension between the crypto community’s emphasis on self-sovereignty and the push for institutional involvement. While large-scale institutional custody can provide security for some, the importance of decentralization and self-custody remains a bedrock principle for many in the space. This episode highlights the ongoing debate over Bitcoin’s future and the role institutions should—or shouldn’t—play in it.
I support self-custody for those willing & able, the right to self-custody for all, and freedom to choose the form of custody & custodian for individuals & institutions globally. #Bitcoin benefits from all forms of investment by all types of entities, and should welcome everyone.
— Michael Saylor⚡️ (@saylor) October 23, 2024