Ethereum in the New World Order

Davos is an interesting place this year. 

It’s a “who’s who” of the crypto industry, with appearances from Brian Armstrong, Jeremy Allaire, CZ, and Larry Fink (who’s now one of us 😁).

Despite Crypto being front-and-center, the real story rocketing around the world is the explicit messaging from the Trump administration about the phase change of the global world order. 

There were two big speeches coming out of Davos highlighting this. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's “Globalism has failed” talk, and Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney’s response: “The rules-based international order is undergoing a rupture, not a transition.”

Rules-Based International Order vs. The Law of the Jungle 

Ever since WWII, the international community has produced a semblance of orderliness and cooperation. The UN, despite being a relatively impotent organization, was regarded with respect and truly mattered when it came to State decision-making. 

“International Law” was real, but mainly because we all believed in it. We collectively made it matter. 

Donald Trump's administration has decided to puncture this shared illusion. 

Trump’s opinion is that this “Rules-Based International Order” is only a thing because the U.S. allowed it to be so. Being the most powerful country with the most powerful military means that we are the ones actually producing this “Rules-Based International Order,” and Trump’s “America First” vision means that he doesn’t want to play nice with the rest of the world anymore. 

According to Trump, and articulated by Lutnick in his speech, this paradigm is not in the best interest of America, and so we’re going to do something else now. 

Nic Carter is right here – the State is the highest-order organizing body that humanity has produced. Before Nation-States, it was religion and monarchies that were the highest-order organizing structure that humans came up with, and before that it was feudalism and tribes. 

We tried to create higher-order structures through “shared agreements” with things like the UN, but those things proved to be very weak and imparted very little influence upon the world. 

So, here we are. In the year 2026, the U.S. is throwing in the towel on the attempt to create higher-order unifying organizational structures, and saying that we’re better off fending for ourselves. 

For what it's worth, pariah states like Russia and Iran thrive on weak international order. They have always operated by laws of power, and have leveraged the weakness of “Rules-Based International Order” to expand their power and commit the human rights violations that the UN has simply scolded. 

While it's sad to see attempts at global cooperation being thrown out, at least we can finally speak plainly about how Russia and China were never playing by these rules anyway. 

So here is our new world: 

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and decentralized crypto protocols 

Decentralized crypto protocols are powerful and sovereign “higher order organizational structures” that failed to manifest from the “Rules-Based International Order” paradigm. 

Donald Trump's balkanization of the unified international community is exactly the world that Ethereum is designed to counterbalance.

While the unified world falls apart into regional powers, Ethereum reunifies it in cyberspace. 

These protocols do not enforce laws or protect their people. They do not replace nation-states. But nonetheless, they are an omnipresent sovereign coordination layer for the people of the world to unite upon.

This power was expressed in Brian Armstrong's exchange with the French central banker. The central banker was doing what all central bankers do, which is misunderstand and underestimate Bitcoin, and Brian was correcting him about how “Bitcoin doesn’t have an issuer – it’s a decentralized protocol…” and then he followed up with the most important part about Bitcoin's role in unifying the world: “... [Bitcoin] is actually the greatest accountability mechanism on deficit spending.” 

No, we’re not getting “Rules-Based International Order” from voluntary Nation-State coordination and cooperation. But are we getting “Rules-Based International Order” from a decentralized, cryptographic math-based internet protocol? 

Bitcoin operates by if-this-then-that statements. Sounds like “Rules-Based International Order” to me. Does Ethereum not extend this same principle to Turing-complete smart contracts? 

Despite the despair and negative sentiments of the current crypto industry, I still remain convinced we have not yet scratched the surface of what smart contracts can do. 

So, maybe we don’t get “Rules-Based International Order” from the UN. 

Maybe we get it from an unexpected place instead. 

Maybe we get it from Ethereum.