A Faster Push for Fast Finality

When Paradigm's Matt Huang sought to justify why Stripe chose to build Tempo as a new L1 rather than an Ethereum L2, he offered a laundry list of reasons. And while a good deal of said reasons seemed to be summarily shrugged off by the Ethereum community, developers paid close attention to his mentions of Fast Finality.
"We are prioritizing attributes like fast finality," Huang had written, adding that while "some of these are technically possible for an L2... L2s are generally only as final as the underlying L1."
The responses to Huang's post were varied, but showcased a clear reality for Ethereum: in the race to build global payment infrastructure, speed has become non-negotiable. And while Ethereum's development team has made great strides here, market expectations may necessitate sharpening this focus.
The only serious technical argument in this post is fast L1 finality—something we as L2s can neither fix nor mitigate. We fully depend on the L1 progress rate here.
— ALEX | ZKsync ∎ (@gluk64) September 6, 2025
I'd told @ethereumfndn leadership earlier in summer that's the ONLY thing we care about on the ETH roadmap. https://t.co/LWb3jNBhKg
What is Fast Finality?
At its core, finality in blockchain is the guarantee that once a transaction is confirmed, it's set in stone — irreversible, unchangeable, and safe from any network hiccups or reorganizations. Fast finality simply delivers this assurance in seconds or even sub-seconds, rather than making you wait around, twiddling your thumbs.
Ethereum's current setup is solid but arguably sluggish. Blocks come every 12 seconds, and transactions can be included pretty quickly, but full economic finality — the point where you're truly confident it won't get rolled back — comes around 12–15 minutes. That's the time it takes for two epochs under Proof-of-Stake, where validators pile on attestations to lock things in.
While this has worked solidly enough to date, many players in the market are increasingly demanding that this stretch of time drops to 2 seconds or less. Scaling to meet the use cases of commercial payments and high-volume institutional flows necessitates a deeper commitment to speed at the L1 level.
Why Fast Finality Matters Now
Ethereum doesn't need to be convinced here for its inclusion on the roadmap, with fast finality long embedded in its roadmap as a key upgrade to enhance user experience.
Any rollout requires pushing speed across the network without compromising decentralization, an area where Ethereum inarguably bests its younger (and often faster) alt-L1 peers. Ethereum's network currently has more than 1.1 million validators running on everyday hardware with just 32 ETH (~$140K) staked.
if eth is to become a true settlement layer, fast finality is still one of the most important missing features
— lincoln.base.eth (@MurrLincoln) September 6, 2025
my master’s thesis focused on single slot finality for ethereum! here’s a TLDR on what finality is, how consensus works, and where this is going 🧵 https://t.co/lw9zrdjuxh
Ethereum's Roadmap in Focus
While fast finality has long been set for inclusion, community members are increasingly pushing the EF to accelerate the push for the sake of Ethereum's long-term health.
In conversations around Huang’s explanation, the EF’s Barnabe Monnot shared updates on the initiatives in motion to bring about the so desired fast finality:
- They're working to reduce block intervals from 12 to 6 seconds, with successful tests already completed.
- A new "fast confirmation rule" will allow transactions to be strongly confirmed in just 1–3 blocks (10–30 seconds) instead of waiting for full finality.
- Core protocol improvements inspired by Vitalik's proposals are being explored, along with next-generation consensus mechanisms like three-slot finality.
The timeline, according to him, looks something like this: fast confirmation rules in 3–6 months, shortened block intervals in about a year via hard fork, core system enhancements in 1.5–2 years, and new consensus mechanisms in 2–3 years, though he suggests some of this could be accelerated.
Let's bring fast finality asap to @ethereum !
— barnabe.eth (@barnabemonnot) September 6, 2025
We published an update on our related work and projects last Friday, and on this topic, these are the relevant points:
- Shorten slot times to increase the heartbeat of the network and decrease every delay: Time to inclusion / fast… https://t.co/sRrbSFJWDr
The Path Forward
Efforts are clearly being made, but critics are still fair to point out that 2–3 years is an eternity in crypto. It's plenty of time for specialized chains to carve out niches in payments and institutional settlement, despite lacking Ethereum's broader guarantees.
Ethereum has solved the hard problems that make it suitable as global, public infrastructure. Yet for select use cases, prioritizing speed sooner could prevent it from being overlooked in the short term – something Ryan Berckman digs into further in this thread.
Stripe's fading of how crypto actually works
— ⟠ (@ryanberckmans) September 6, 2025
Patrick's essay below suggests that he may be missing the bigger picture of exactly how and why crypto is useful.
When you miss the big picture, you can over-index on the small picture, and that can cause you to make strategic… https://t.co/wRwsRZDFZe
Whether or not chains like Tempo gain traction temporarily, in the end it is difficult to imagine corporate chains selling the vision of non-neutral shared settlement space to the world's financial players as a lasting solution.
Nevertheless, the wider trend embodied by Stripe's move showcases why bumping up fast finality as a priority aligns with Ethereum's strengths – not because speed trumps decentralization, but because combining the two ensures the network's achievements aren't sidelined, even temporarily.